Spike Lee, Alec Baldwin, and Rosie O’Donnell all have something in common. They don’t like the 2nd amendment . . . except when they want to invoke it to commit a violent statement against someone.
Alec Baldwin suggested shooting Henry Hyde’s wife and kids, Spike Lee wants to shoot Charlton Heston, and Rosie O’Donnell thinks Tom Selleck should be lined up with the rest. All because these men are trying to protect freedom guaranteed in the first and second Amendments.
Ironically, all these people believe that the same constitution protects the right of woman to kill her unborn child.
But what would the response be if the retort of Henry Hyde, Charlton Heston and Tom Selleck, had been as ugly and politically motivated?
For example, suggesting that Spike, Alec and Rosie have their brains sucked out after the base of their skull is punctured with scissors, as is done to live babies during a partial birth abortion? That would be considered outrageous, cruel, insensitive and just downright mean.
They are right, it would be… just as suggesting that people who support the 2nd Amendment and freedom, should be shot. This is Nina May challenging hypocrisy.