by ·Comments Off on Teaching Creationism vs. Evolution

Finally scientists are realizing that there might be something to the creation story and are saying it should at least get equal time with evolution on public schools. But an enlightened professor at the University of California disagrees.

He says that “the country would become a laughing stock if we don’t teach our kids good science. They will be handicapped in a world that depends on good science.”

Does that mean that America never produced brilliant scientists, inventors, mathematicians when creationism WAS taught in public schools? I don’t think even the professor could say that.

No, laughing stocks are created by leaders who forget where they come from and that they are made in the image of God .. . no matter what the scientists may think.

A scientist who is seeking the truth will use every source of information available to him, including the Bible, which has been proven to be historically accurate. So the debate may rage on, but the facts speak for themselves. There must be something in that book called the Bible to have everyone so upset about it. Could it be that it really is the word of God? Why not open it and see.

This is Nina May at ninamay.com.

by ·Comments Off on What Price Liberty?

Many people are applauding the new move to put surveillance cameras in classrooms, halls, bathrooms and other areas in schools.

Although this seems like a wonderful solution to protect students, what we are doing is training a new generation of kids to accept surveillance as a part of life.

We are telling them that their constitutional rights are fungible and can be exchanged for the “hope” of a safer environment.

This is the same nanny state that monitors everything from the temperature of coffee to what types of conversations are acceptable at office water coolers.

As a country, we have willingly given up more and more rights in the name of a safer society, yet people still burn themselves with hot coffee.

The answer is not to punish the innocent by treating them as common criminals in a prison . . . the answer is accountability and setting standards and rules that will automatically cull out the troublemakers.

Lines at airports are insufferably long because a handful of people abused their freedom and now the rest of the world suffers.

Punishment is a far better motivator for the one bad apple, than holding the rest of the barrel hostage to their behavior.

by ·Comments Off on Moderation vs. Extremism (a different perspective)

When the Iowa Caucus revealed that George W. Bush won a majority, there seemed to be a collective sigh of relief that the right-wing extremists were defeated.

That is not the case though. If you add the numbers of Gary Bauer, Pat Buchanan, Alan Keyes and Dan Quayle, clearly the collective voice of conservatives… the total is almost 25%, putting them second behind George W.

This doesn’t even take into consideration the “right-wingers” who voted for the top three vote getters. So in reality, the right-wing was well represented, which dispels the idea of extremism.

While liberals applaud moderation, they should be reminded of someone who said, “Though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist… I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label.” He goes on to list other extremists in history, Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Abraham Lincoln. And he himself wrote these words from jail when his fellow, moderate clergymen tried to rebuke him for his extremism.

This man was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his extremist views changed the course of history.

So this is Nina May challenging moderation.

by ·Comments Off on Warren Beatty for President?

So Warren Beatty wants to be President. I don’t know why we are surprised . . . a President’s wife wants to be Senator, a wrestler is governor . . . why not an actor for President?

This might finally silence the anti-Reagan detractors. But if Warren wants to be President, he is going to need a bigger platform than just “getting big money out of politics” and “changing economic disparities in American life.”

Of course to exemplify his concern for the plight of the less fortunate, he is surrounding himself with very wealthy people as advisors. But where does he stand on school vouchers that would benefit the poor?  Tax cuts that help the middle class, and deregulation of government that would help everyone?

He claims to be a sixties liberal which is now very status quo. Where is the revolution?

It might work in a movie having a millionaire actor playing the part of the voice of the down-trodden. But it will be a little hard to swallow worn-out, socialist rhetoric, about redistribution of wealth, while the spokesman is a millionaire.

His wealthy advisors need to tell him that no matter how good an actor he is . . . this will be a very difficult role to play.

by ·Comments Off on When a First Lady Leaves a Lasting Legacy For Her Country, Everyone Benefits

While United States is keeping God out of the public arena, a country in Central America is welcoming Him with open arms.

When her husband became President of Guatemala, three years ago, Patricia Arzu was asked what her “project” would be as the new First Lady.

She said, “I want to make sure ever single child in school has a Bible of their own.”

She also understood the importance of teaching moral values in the schools and relied on text books and materials that had been used in the United States . . . before God was banned.

She also works to bring the parents into the training and has a project that teaches the mothers about parenting skills based on Biblical principals.

This project is totally funded by the private sector and she has her detractors, to be sure, but Patricia Arzu is not deterred.

The lasting legacy that one women is leaving the children of Guatemala is far greater, more profound, constructive and positive, than the legacy left to the American children by another woman.

This is Nina May reminding you that one person can make a difference. . . just what kind of difference will it be?

by ·Comments Off on To Truly Reflect America, the Democrats Need to be More Open Minded

California Democrats have decided that the fairest way to reflect America is to have a quota system for all their delegates.

The breakdown is as follows .. . twenty six percent will be Hispanic, sixteen percent black, ten percent disabled, nine percent Asian-Pacific Islander, five percent gay, five percent lesbian and one percent Indian.

That’s seventy two percent and they haven’t even mentioned Caucasoids. What do they do if someone qualifies on two or three counts? Which quota is filled? What happens if they accidently get six percent gay because one percent is Hispanic and gay… will they be told they don’t qualify because they are over the gay quota? Won’t that be illegal to ask about someone’s sexual orientation and then dismiss them because of it? And what if two percent of the men are cross-dressers and qualify as women and then it is discovered they are men… will they be told they can’t be delegates? It is interesting that there is no quota for the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy… shouldn’t that small minority be represented in order to truly reflect the face of America?

This is Nina May suggesting that the Democrats shouldn’t try and make their party look like America… either it does or it doesn’t.

by ·Comments Off on What’s Good for the Goose is Good For the Commander

An Air Force Captain is being court-martialed for his relationship with his wife . . . before they were married.  He could face up to 28 years in prison if convicted of all nine counts against him.

He broke the rules saying you can’t date or have sexual relations with any enlisted person. He admits his actions were wrong and believes his military career is over.

His wife served fifty days in jail for lying about her relationship with her husband . . . and disobeyed orders to stay away from him.

She was demoted and is expected to be discharged. The obvious question here is, why are the standards so much higher for people in the military, and not for the Commander in Chief . . . the President?

If an enlisted person can spend 50 days in jail for lying, why isn’t her Commander in Chief held to the same standards? It would be interesting to see what type of punishment this enlisted woman would have received if it had been the Commander in Chief she had been having an affair with.

Would she still have spent 50 days in jail . . . and would he be facing 28 years in prison for lying?

This is Nina May, just curious as to how blind justice really is.

by ·Comments Off on Mormons Want Consistency in Marriage Law

The Mormon church in California opposes the legalization of same-sex marriages and have been raising money to fight the issue.   As a result, they have been reported to the IRS for violating their tax exempt status.

Yet there are several homosexual activists groups who have a similar tax exempt standing who have not been reported to the IRS by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Do we smell hypocrisy again from the left?

But what is really interesting, is that of all the groups in America that have a bonafide right to oppose same sex marriages . . . it is the Mormons.

After all, they were told by the Federal Government that they could not have more than one wife even though that had been part of their religious belief system.

So if the IRS tells the Mormon church they can’t express an opinion, educate their parishioner and take a moral stand on an issue that is important to them . . . won’t they have to tell the pro-homosexual groups the same?

And if for some reason Californians do vote to legally acknowledge same-sex marriages . . . won’t they necessarily have to allow Mormons to have more than one wife?

by ·Comments Off on Is Art What Decides if it is Hate Speech or Just Opinion?

There is a move to redefine hate speech and hate crimes. It is actually redundant to all actions that are now illegal.

Do we question that a man hates a woman when he rapes her? That certainly isn’t an act of love.

Does a man of one race kill one of another race because he loves him? No . . . whatever the motivation . . . it is still a murder and it was obviously hateful.

But what if the hate takes on a more elitist character . . . one less hostile, but more, say, artistic?

For example the anti-Catholic art exhibit in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Because it is artistic in nature, it is intended to be controversial, illicit passion and emotion.

Art is after all . . .the great license of the age. But we the public are not supposed to think it is hateful to see “blasphemous misuses of rosary beads and crucifixes”, or to see the Virgin Mary depicted as the “Great Harlot.”

But what if a very impressionable person learned to hate Catholics as a result of this display and committed a hate crime against one?

Or what if this artist decided it was another group that he wanted to defile? It becomes selective hate . . . and teaches people to tolerate some types of hate. But when society fails to draw that line . . . people start doing it themselves . . . and . . . its not a pretty picture.

by ·Comments Off on The Double Standard Democrats are on the Prowl Again

In an incredible show of partisan hypocrisy, the Democrats are huffing and puffing and insisting that George W. Bush answer the question of the century… “Has he ever done cocaine?”

He should of course respond he would be glad to answer that as soon as Bill answers the questions… “Did he rape Juanita, expose himself to Paula, know the Chinese were being given classified information, and… what is in his medical records?”

We seem to have survived as a Republic not knowing the answers to these questions, and we certainly won’t perish if we don’t know if Bush did cocaine as a young man. More serious questions to ask George Bush would be, “How many sovereign nations does he plan to bomb while covering his back side? How many times will he lie to the American people about reducing taxes while vetoing the largest tax cut in history? How many times did he dodge the draft and declare his loathing of the military?”

These questions are far more important to ask of George W. Bush than whether or not he did cocaine. This is Nina May suggesting that the Democrats get the logs out of their own eyes first.